@inproceedings {1980, title = {Novel Approaches for the Development of Trusted IoT Entities}, booktitle = {37th International Conference on ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection {\textendash} IFIP SEC 2022}, year = {2022}, month = {06/2022}, pages = {215-230}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, address = {Copenhagen}, keywords = {Internet of Things (IoT), SysML, System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)., Trust, UML}, issn = {1868-4238 }, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06975-8}, url = {https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007\%2F978-3-031-06975-8_13}, author = {Davide Ferraris and Carmen Fernandez-Gago and Javier Lopez} } @inproceedings {1981, title = {Verification and Validation Methods for a Trust-by-Design Framework for the IoT}, booktitle = {36th Annual IFIP WG 11.3 Conference on Data and Applications Security and Privacy (DBSec{\textquoteright}22)}, volume = {13383}, year = {2022}, month = {07/2022}, pages = {183-194}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, address = {Newark, NJ, USA}, keywords = {Internet of Things (IoT), SysML, System Development Life Cycle (SDLC), Trust, UML}, isbn = {978-3-031-10683-5}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10684-2_11}, url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-10684-2_11}, author = {Davide Ferraris and Carmen Fernandez-Gago and Javier Lopez} } @article {ferraris2020b, title = {A model-driven approach to ensure trust in the IoT}, journal = {Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences}, volume = {10}, number = {50}, year = {2020}, month = {12/2020}, publisher = {Springer}, abstract = {

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a paradigm that permits smart entities to be interconnected anywhere and anyhow. IoT opens new opportunities but also rises new issues.
In this dynamic environment, trust is useful to mitigate these issues. In fact, it is important that the smart entities could know and trust the other smart entities in order to collaborate with them.
So far, there is a lack of research when considering trust through the whole System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) of a smart IoT entity.
In this paper, we suggest a new approach that considers trust not only at the end of the SDLC but also at the start of it. More precisely, we explore the modeling phase proposing a model-driven approach extending UML and SysML considering trust and its related domains, such as security and privacy.
We propose stereotypes for each diagram in order to give developers a way to represent trust elements in an effective way.
Moreover, we propose two new diagrams that are very important for the IoT: a traceability diagram and a context diagram.
This model-driven approach will help developers to model the smart IoT entities according to the requirements elicited in the previous phases of the SDLC.
These models will be a fundamental input for the following and final phases of the SDLC.

}, keywords = {Internet of Things (IoT), SysML, System Development Life Cycle (SDLC), Trust, UML}, issn = {2192-1962 }, doi = {10.1186/s13673-020-00257-3}, author = {Davide Ferraris and Carmen Fernandez-Gago and Javier Lopez} } @article {kolar2019trust, title = {A Model Specification for the Design of Trust Negotiations}, journal = {Computers \& Security}, volume = {84}, year = {2019}, month = {04/2019}, pages = {288-300}, publisher = {Elsevier}, type = {Full article}, abstract = {

Trust negotiation is a type of trust management model for establishing trust between entities by a mutual exchange of credentials. This approach was designed for online environments, where the attributes of users, such as skills, habits, behaviour and experience are unknown. Required criteria of trust negotiation must be supported by a trust negotiation model in order to provide a functional, adequately robust and efficient application. Such criteria were identified previously. In this paper we are presenting a model specification using a UML-based notation for the design of trust negotiation. This specification will become a part of the Software Development Life Cycle, which will provide developers a strong tool for incorporating trust and trust-related issues into the software they create. The specification defines components and their layout for the provision of the essential functionality of trust negotiation on one side as well as optional, additional features on the other side. The extra features make trust negotiation more robust, applicable for more scenarios and may provide a privacy protection functionality.

}, keywords = {Policy, Software Development Life Cycle, Trust Model, Trust Negotiation, UML}, issn = {0167-4048}, doi = {10.1016/j.cose.2019.03.024}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404818310484}, author = {Martin Kolar and Carmen Fernandez-Gago and Javier Lopez} }